Garmin Edge 1030 vs Edge 830: A Comparison (Which Is Right For You?)

The purpose of this post is to (wait for it…) compare the Garmin Edge 1030 with the Edge 830 so you can work out which is best bike GPS choice for you.

(Essentially, is it worth you paying a bit more in order to get the extra 200?)

So we’ll be looking at (and comparing) things like size, weight, the screen, buttons (buttons!), as well as the software features, both basic and sophisticated, so you can decide which bests suits your road cycling needs (whether that’s your actual ones or your perceived, I’m-on-the-verge-of-turning-professional-at-age-45, needs).

Capiche? Alrighty. On with the show!

Summary Comparison: Which Should You Buy?

You should go for the:

  • Garmin Edge 1030 – if you want a fully-featured bike GPS (including all of Garmin’s latest software upgrades) with proper mapping functionality, all with a nice big touchscreen;

Or the:

  • Garmin Edge 830 – if you want the same feature set but in a newer, smaller (and lighter) device with a smaller screen (still touchscreen though). And it’s cheaper.

Note: links like the ones above are affiliate links – if you click and buy something, I may get a small commission (my affiliate links policy).

Quick Point Of Order

I don’t actually own either of these devices. I do, however use bike GPS devices A LOT. And I like looking into the details.

I own a Garmin Edge 520 (and a knackered 510), a Wahoo ELEMNT BOLT and I was sent a Bryton Rider 450 for a long term review. I’m an enthusiastic road cyclist, riding 2-4 times a week, when work and family allows.

I thought I’d do some research and jot down my findings here, for your benefit (to help decide between the two) as well as my own (1. I could well buy one; 2. if you click one of the affiliate links and buy a GPS, I might get a small commission).

So What Are They?

Every time with you people!?!

The Garmin Edge 830 and 1030 are both cycling GPS devices (or ‘bike computers’). The core function of a bike computer, whence attached to the handlebars, is to measuring and record how fast you’re going, how far you’ve ridden, how quickly you’re spinning the pedals.

Garmin Edge 1030 photo
The Garmin Edge 1030

The GPS bit means that the device communicates, through the medium of magic air wires, with satellites during the ride such that it knows where you are and can record where you’ve been.

This data is then uploaded to Strava* and you are awarded a KOM of the Mountain Segment. Or something.

(* Other ride recording and sharing apps are available… we just don’t approve of them.)

Age

The 1030 has been around since August 2017, so at the time of writing (September 2019), the model is two years old.

In the meantime, like all Garmin GPS devices, it has received various firmware updates, fixing bugs (initially) and then, over time, adding new features.

Garmin Edge 830 photo
The Garmin Edge 830 in captivity

But it’s worth noting that the Edge 1000 was around for 3 years before the 1030 replaced it, so you’d guess that the 1030 will be due for a facelift in 12 months or so.

The 830 is newer, having only been launched in April 2019. The previous Edge 820 was launched in July 2016. Based on this, you’d expect the 830 to remain ‘current’ for at least two years (and likely continue to serve all your needs for many years thereafter).

Size and Weight (Weeny)

The 1030 is a larger device than the 830, with a 3.5 inch screen. The 830 has to make do with a 2.6 incher.

Physically, the main difference is length. With both devices approximately the same width and depth, the 1030 is 30mm longer (to accommodate that larger screen dontcha know)

All of this translates into 54g of weight difference (the 1030 obviously being heavier).

Garmin Edge 1030 side angle
Garmin Edge 1030 side angle

It’s for you to decide whether that weight difference is important. 54g is neither here nor there unless you’re a pro rider with sub-5% body fat (it’s less than the weight of a Clif Bar – other energy bars are available…).

Equally, for many, the larger screen ‘real estate’ won’t provide massive benefit. My smallish iPhone 7 (on which I’m drafting this post) has a 4.7in screen, so the 1030 isn’t huge in real terms.

My bike GPS buying history shows I tend to buy smaller devices (Edge 520, Wahoo ELEMNT Bolt), which I think look better (rather subjectively…) attached to the handlebars, and then use my phone for larger-screen activities (looking at maps, designing routes, reading the Financial Times…).

Battery Life

Good news. I can keep this brief. Battery life doesn’t need to impact your buying decision.

Both devices have a claimed ‘up to 20 hours’ battery life.

Which is more than enough to accommodate my 1-3 hour rides…

Connectivity

Another section that doesn’t require many words.

In terms of connectivity – the ability of the device to:

  • connect to data sensors on your bike (speed/cadence, power meter) and person (heart rate monitor);
  • connect to your smartphone via Bluetooth and to Wi-fi networks;
  • find all the requisite satellites it needs to establish your location on this beautiful planet

… the Edge 1030 and 830 are … pretty much the same.

Historically Garmin used to focus only on data sensors that connected via ANT+ (maybe because it owns the protocol). More recent Garmin devices, including the 1030 and 830, now also connect to Bluetooth Smart sensors.

So that’s all good.

Touchscreen!

Both the 1030 and 830 are touchscreen devices. So you’ll be navigating through the screens, changing settings, selecting routes through the medium of … touching the screen.

No buttons needed (actually not true – both devices have two physical buttons on their bottom edges and one on the side).

Garmin Edge 1030 side
Alors – the touchscreen device has a physical button!

Either way, the touchscreen/buttons situation is the same for both units. So not a criteria on which to make a decision between the two.

Mapping and Route Creation

Both the Edge 830 and 1030 know where you are and what street you live on…

Unlike, say, the Edge 530, the Wahoo ELEMNT Bolt, the Bryton Rider 450, all of which simply plot waypoints overlaid onto a map, Garmin’s two higher-end bike GPS devices have ‘proper’ GPS navigation.

In other words, you can select an address or a point of interest on 830 or the 1030, and the device itself will calculate a route based on knowing where the roads are and the type of road or cycle path.

If you go off-course, or you want to tack an extra bit onto your ride, the device can be used to re-route on the fly.

Garmin Edge 830 front
It does not feel like a coincidence that promotional shots have the word ‘Bernal’ in them…

The launch of the 830 saw the introduction of ‘popularity routing’. This uses data from all the rides uploaded to Garmin’s Connect ride tracking (and everything else) platform to select roads that are popular with other cyclists (similar to the heatmap feature on Strava). This has since been added to the 1030.

So in terms of mapping functionality, the Edge 830 and 1030 are the same, so nothing to choose between them. However, the 830 does benefit from a faster processor than older Edges, including the 1030. As a result, the 830 is quicker at calculating a route.

Now this is less important if (like me) you still plan to plot routes elsewhere (RideWithGPS, Komoot) and upload or sync them with the GPS device. For these ‘use cases’ you’re not asking the Edge to engage its brain as much.

On the other hand, if you plan to use the device like your car satnav (get in, jam in a postcode (zip code…), set off), then I’m guessing you’ll appreciate the shorter wait times that the faster 830 processor offers.

Features! Features! Features!

With the launch of the 830 in 2019, Garmin introduced a raft of new software features that weren’t on existing models, including the 1030.

However, alluded to above, the 1030 subsequently got a firmware update to add said new features (and like all ‘current’ models, continues to get firmware updates from time to time to fix bugs, tweak stuff – you know, techy things).

Garmin Edge 1030 front

This isn’t the post to go into all of these funky software features in detail. I’d say the most interesting ones for enthusiastic (non-pro) road cyclists such as me and thee are:

  • ClimbPro: shows how much distance and ascent height you still have to conquer on a climb
  • More detailed training status data displays, after you have completed a ride
  • More factors (heat, altitude) used to calculate performance and recovery metrics
  • Smart nutrition and hydration alerts whilst riding, plus the ability to record nutrition and hydration consumed
  • Various mountain bike features (mainly integration with Trailforks): in case you swing both ways when it comes to on- and off-road riding.

And that’s just a small smattering of what’s available on these feature-rich bike computers. Given that they’re all available on both the Edge 830 and 1030, though, the software features are not a useful basis on which to decide between the two.

Price

In Garmin recommended price terms, the Edge 830 is significantly cheaper than the 1030 (although neither of them are particularly cheap in absolute terms).

Right now the difference is £150 in the UK and $200 in the US.

Click here to see the latest price on Amazon:

And £150 / $200 is not a small amount, so definitely a factor in most people’s buying decision between the two.

Which One Would I Buy?

For me this is a bit of a no brainer. I’d choose the 830 over the 1030.

From a technical perspective, for my needs at least, the 830 does everything the 1030 can do. With the extra processing horsepower, it’s faster at doing it.

Whilst I have no legitimate need to be more aero, the smaller size (‘form factor’) suits my secret desire to emulate professional riders (and whilst some of them may use it, I don’t recall seeing a pro’s bike mounted with the Edge 1000 or 1030).

The smaller screen size is fine – if I temporarily need a device with a larger screen, there is a more powerful and flexible one in my jersey pocket.

That said, an awful lot of people do like the larger screen on the Edge 1030.

If you’re buying one of these two devices for their smarter, on-device navigation capabilities, there is something to be said for choosing the bigger viewable area, which should make the whole route creation thang a little bit easier.

So, as always, ‘orses for courses. Your mileage may vary. Talk to the hand. Ahem.

Buy a Bike GPS And Support My Blog

If you got value from this post (heck, even if you didn’t), please feel free to purchase your next bike computer through one of my affiliate links below. You pay the same price and I might get a small commission.

Many thanks and see you in my next post.

5 thoughts on “Garmin Edge 1030 vs Edge 830: A Comparison (Which Is Right For You?)”

    • It’s a good point Jeff. My hands on experience is limited but I’ve certainly read about the issue. Your post mentions DC Rainmaker – i recall listening to his podcast where he was talking about Garmin essentially using the buying public as beta testers for new products and features (i.e. because they were launching before all the bugs were ironed out) and how it was strange that they didn’t use their legions of fitness enthusiast employees as a testing cohort. My 510 and 520 were both stable – but then neither was bought just after the product was released – and I did actually have to return my ELEMNT Bolt to Wahoo for replacement. That said, I’m still generally liking Wahoo over Garmin these days…

  1. I’ve used an Edge 810 for several years but had become increasingly frustrated by its touch screen idiosyncrasies and my share of failures (only!) on big rides, I thought an upgrade to the 530 would be in order. The beep alert function (Radar warning/timer/drink etc) utterly useless – almost inaudible and the Radar often dropping out for no obvious reason (it’s their own product!) so it quickly went back.
    (If the alert function is important to anyone, the 830 may have the same issue as the 530).
    I ride a lot on quiet country roads and rely on the Garmin Varia Radar to alert me to vehicles well before I can hear them so when Wahoo recently announced their update to handle Radar, the only question was which model?
    I went for the ELEMNT Roam. It took a little getting used to after the 810, but as Jeff says, it just works. Navigation is clearer, screen more readable (and flexible) and my trust now re-assigned – while I have (and trust) the Radar, I’m less likely to go for any other Garmin product again.

  2. I have had an 830 now since it came out. Previously I had an 800 which I’ve had for about 6 years and bought second hand and with which I have never had any issues whatsoever. The 830 has lots of features some of which are great and others not of any interest to me.
    What issues have I had?
    When I first got it then if I switched it on indoors it would automatically start recording a ride and have me travelling even though I was going nowhere, really frustrating as I would be just trying to set up a screen or something. This seems to have disappeared now.
    Second was it was giving me an incredible FTP in 4 figures, I spoke to Garmin and they claimed there was a problem with my Power Meter (Rotor) however whilst I was communicating with Rotor about the issue Garmin issued a new release which just so happened to mention fixing FTP issues! I was disappointed with Garmin trying to blame Rotor for the problem. After the upgrade it still occassionally miscalculated my FTP but again seems to be fixed now.
    Third is connection to my phone, an IPhone 5S, old yes but still works, sometimes it connects and sometimes it doesn’t, sometimes it uploads the ride at the end and sometimes it doesn’t, I find I have to switch off the Garmin and switch it on again to get it to sync but this doesn’t always happen. These days I rely on my home wifi to upload but even then I have to switch it off and switch it back on again to kickstart its transfer. Also Livetrack doesn’t always start as a result of connectivity issues.
    Fourth Incident Detection which in theory is a great idea but I was finding if I braked hard it would start the process of calling my wife if I didn’t stop it within the allowed time. This became really annoying and I switched it off.
    Fifth a couple of times I have been unable to get it to start up again if I have stopped on an ride and switched it off. The screen flickers and seems to try to start and then switch off and start again in quick succession.
    Sixth when I set the routing on Road and set a destination it can, at times, try to take me down farm tracks which I guess is down to the maps accuracy.
    Seventh when I was cycling in Scotland it would create false climbs. Spoke with Garmin about this and they said it would be because an increase in elevation was close to the road. This made sense as it would happen when the road was, for instance, alongside a Loch and there would be almost a cliff at the otherside of the road
    I’ve not tried Bike Alarm as I’m not willing to leave an expensive Garmin on my bike that someone could easily steal.
    What do I like:
    I do like the climb facility as it gives me the knowledge of how steep and how far I have left to climb. A great advantage when a mate things he has you beat and you know you are on a false flat 🙂
    The reminders to eat or drink are great as I often forget to do both and when racing end up bonking due to not fuelling well. You can allow it to calculate when to do both or set your own reminders. If I’m out on a training ride I let it calculate but in a race I will set 10 min reminders.
    I train using power and workouts and being able to upload a workout and watch that my power is within the workout range visually or have audible warnings on other screens if I am above or below the set power range is great. Also for interval training where I have a set length of time and power range is great with a count down of 5 to either start or finish an interval
    I like that I can set it to see my average power for a number of seconds so have it set to show both 3 second power and 30 second power to give me a better view of power, otherwise it would jump about too much.
    It’s great for me at the end of a ride to see performance data and how well I’ve fuelled/drunk compared to its predictions and recently in a race using it I didn’t bonk and was really happy with my performance as a result
    Weather report is marginally useful but I have just installed the AccuWeather app which in theory gives me minute by minute predictions and I can plan my coffee breaks around the predicted rain etc 🙂

    Why did I buy it? My old Garmin was exactly that, old, and I was used to Garmin. Would I buy it again, probably, but not when it first comes out, too many issues but it seems to be settling down although some issues remain that I find ways around and hopefully will improve with releases. Version 5 is just out so hope that is fixing some. Would I recommend it? Not sure, certainly if you use workouts and can create them and upload to the Garmin it is a great tool. And if you like looking at lots of data. But if you don’t have a Power Meter and Heart Rate monitor and are just out riding for fun then there is too much on this that you will never use.

  3. I think l you will find there are some pro teams using the 1030 ( the white surround is a give away) and previously the 1000 too, if you look hard enough if it really matters?

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.