Wahoo ELEMNT vs ELEMNT BOLT – What Are The Differences (And Which Is Better)?

So my current bike computer is close to giving up the goat. And the ghost.

I’ve been waiting for this moment for some time. Having been in new bike GPS purchase mode almost constantly for the past 4 years (who isn’t?), it’s time to thrust my short Yorkshire arms into those deep Yorkshire pockets and ‘level up’ my electronic bike bling.

What’s that? The Garmin Edge is not the only show in town, you say? (Shurely shome mishtake.)

But it is true, we have a new(-ish) biketech contender in town in the form of Wahoo Fitness, with what finally can be described as their ELEMNT range of bike computers (until recently they just had one model). And based on my research THEY ARE GOOD!

So, in this post I’m going to compare the Wahoo ELEMNT with the Wahoo ELEMNT BOLT in an effort to determine their relative merits. Then I’m going to buy one.

You’ll have to read, or at least go, to the end of this post to find out which (oooh, the suspenders…).

Note: This post contains affiliate links. If you click one and buy something, I make a commission. This is at no extra cost to you.

Wahoo ELEMNT vs ELEMNT BOLT: Products Mentioned In This Post

Er… that would be:

Wahoo ELEMNT

The original Wahoo bike computer. Larger than the ELEMNT Bolt, it enjoys the same great user experience. An excellent choice if you want a bigger, easy-to-read screen.

Check price
If you click this link and make a purchase, I earn a commission at no additional cost to you.

Wait, You Want To See This Post In Video Format?

Well you’ve come to the right place. I published this video on my YouTube channel in October 2019, so you can see if I’m still happy with my choice of bike computer:

Wahoo Who?

Well, they’re a US firm. I think they started out making an iPhone case for use on your bike. Now they have a range of products, including bike computers and a heart rate monitor strap.

Their highest profile product is probably the KICKR indoor trainer (and its younger sibling, the KICKR SNAP), which is used by Team Sky primarily to delay the jersey presentation ceremony each day on the Tour de France (whilst Chris Froome warms down on it…).

(And their coolest product is the newly-announced CLIMB ‘incline simulator’…)

What’s In A Nme?

First things first. Both devices are missing an ‘E’ from their names. This may or may not be important to you.

This is a Wahoo ‘thing’. They miss letters out of names. Specifically they miss vowels. Sometimes it is the second vowel (‘KICKR’ is the name of their indoor trainer; ‘TICKR’ is a heart rate monitor, much to the delight of ’Allo ’Allo fans globally). Sometimes the third (see ‘ELEMNT’).

When it came to their range of on-bike sensors, they elected to use the full complement of vowels, thus avoiding the challenge of selling consumers on the merits of an ‘RPM SPED’ or an RPM ‘CADNCE’.

Let’s Get This Out Of The Way: I’d Be Happy To Own Either

Both the ELEMNT and the ELEMNT BOLT are what you would describe as ‘fully-featured GPS cycling computers’ (if you go around spouting marketingspeak).

I was also about to say that both are used by professional cyclists and therefore satisfy the ‘good enough for Montgomery and [insert your name here]’ test … BUT … I can’t actually find any pro cycling teams that use them. Maybe it’s because they’re too new.

Presumably it’ll only be a matter of time. As mentioned above, Wahoo already sponsors Team Sky, although only from an indoor trainer perspective.

Wahoo also sponsors Canyon-SRAM, the UCI Women’s World Tour team, but all the photos I can find show riders using Garmins. Maybe they’ll all be BOLTed up in 2018.

THAT ALL SAID… based on all the reviews I have read, and looking at the feature set, it’s safe to say that both the ELEMNT and ELEMNT BOLT will do everything (and more) that I require from a bike computer.

So What Are Those (Fully) Features?

The ELEMNT and BOLT do everything we’ve (now) come to expect from a GPS bike computer. They display and record rider speed and distance throughout the course of the ride, recording the route taken and then make it easy to upload this data to a data repository of your choice (e.g. Strava) when done.

Wahoo ELEMNT angle
The Wahoo ELEMNT

They both offer a range of navigation features, including turn-by-turn instructions and on device maps.

Without going too far into the weeds, neither the ELEMNT nor the BOLT are ‘intelligent’ when it comes to mapping. You can’t create a route on the device itself; they won’t re-route if you go off course. However, they do work closely with your smartphone, via the Wahoo companion app, to get to a position where you can create and amend routes on the fly, and then sync them with the GPS device.

What Else Is The Same Between The ELEMNT and the BOLT?

I expect to go into greater detail in future posts about specific features and capabilities, whichever Wahoo I wa-buy.

For now I’ll just list the remaining features or characteristics that are essentially the same betwixt the two devices:

  • Sensor compatibility – exactly the same for both – Bluetooth Smart can be used to connect with HR straps, cadence and speed sensors; ANT+ for HR, cadence and speed, as well as power meters, electronic gears and assorted ancillary ANT+ accessories (argh);
  • Setup and control is primarily via the Wahoo companion app – a key area where Wahoo differs from Garmin, where more of the latter’s setup and fettling is done via diddling on the device itself;
  • Call and text notifications – they pop up on screen (depending on how you configure it);
  • Indoor trainer control – again exactly the same … and, until about a week ago, only limited to Wahoo’s own KICKR range of trainers. Since then, both the ELEMNT and BOLT have received a software update that enables them to use the ANT+ FE-C protocol used more generally amongst indoor trainer companies (i.e. they now work with most smart indoor trainers);
  • Integration with cycling and training apps – you’ve got your Strava, your Training Peaks, your RIdeWithGPS, amongst others. In the case of Strava, both the ELEMNT and BOLT can handle Strava Live Segments.

So What Is Different?

Actually not much, to tell the truth.

The most obvious difference is that the original ELEMNT is larger than the BOLT. This means it has a larger screen size: 2.7 inches versus 2.2 inches on the BOLT.

Wahoo ELEMNT front view
The ELEMNT (with the LARGR screen)

Neither unit has a touchscreen (like the various Edge units that do have touchscreen). They both have greyscale displays rather than colour (or indeed color).

Screen size requirement is difficult to judge from afar. Given that the BOLT is roughly the same size as my Edge 510 and I’ve been happy enough with the size of the screen on that, I don’t feel a pressing urge to upsize to the ELEMNT.

If you have a preference for a larger screen… then you’ll probably want to consider buying the larger-screened ELEMNT…

Wait, Wait, Weight

The ELEMNT is a full 39.2 grammes heavier than the BOLT and as we all know every little helps when we’re slugging up the mountain side, pedal stroke by painful pedal stroke.

But what we also know is that 39.2g is less than the weight of a ‘grab bag’ of Real McCoys Salt and Vinegar crisps* (‘chips’ for those in the US).

(*Other flavours are available; other crisp manufacturers are available; this website does not condone the use of crisps.)

So the weight thing really doesn’t matter (or more correctly, there is more important weight to be lost elsewhere…).

In Search Of The Good (Battery) Life

Both the ELEMNT and BOLT have integrated rechargeable batteries (as opposed to the new ELEMNT Mini, which uses yer bog standard replaceable coin cell batteries). They do have slightly different stated battery lives – the ELEMNT says ‘up to 17 hours’ and the BOLT is ‘up to 15’ but for my purposes, that’s essentially the same (I am neither riding for 15 hours nor 17 hours in one go…).

Windy Millar

But what about performance in the wind?

On its website, Wahoo describes the BOLT as being ‘the most aerodynamic design’ (implying presumably that the ELEMNT is… not).

This looks to be because the out-front mount that comes with the BOLT has a curved underside that sort of fits into the bottom of the device such that it becomes one streamlined whole.

Wahoo ELEMNT BOLT with integrated mount
ELEMNT BOLT with aero mount

Whilst I have no reason to doubt the claim, until I’ve gone to a wind tunnel in order to finesse my riding position to achieve a straight horizontal back like Bradley Wiggins in his hour world record ride, I’m not going to choose a bike computer based on aerodynamics.

Now if it looks more aero (#moreaero), that’s a good reason to choose one device over another. The BOLT, like it’s Jamaican namesake does look rather aero… (#ratheraero)

Elly Dees

An interesting* feature of the ELEMNT is that it has a track of LEDs that runs across the top edge of the device, and another set of LEDs along the left hand side.

(* Interesting to me at least)

What they are for… and who put them there… nobody knows…

Not quite true.

Wahoo ELEMNT showing LEDs
Wahoo ELEMNT showing LED strips

The LEDs can be set to show either your heart rate, speed or power relative to the ride average for that metric (and power relies on you having a power meter connected). The second set of LEDs on the ELEMNT can indicate that you’ve received a notification or tell you that a workout is paused.

The BOLT eschews the left hand set of LEDs and just runs with the ones that go along the top edge.

I don’t think the number of LEDs is a deciding factor for me. I reckon I can live with just the one set.

Wahoo ELEMNT BOLT front on
ELEMNT BOLT – nuff LEDS?

As an aside on this important topic, since we’re talking about Wahoo, presumably ‘in house’ they’re known as LDs… (much hilarity ensues).

Cost

Now we’re getting to the heart of it. Certainly the heart of what makes Montgomery tick.

The RRP (think you US-ers call it MSRP) of the ELEMNT is £50 higher in the UK (£249 for the ELEMNT; £199 for the BOLT – in both cases not bundled with heart rate strap and speed/cadence sensors).

In the US, I think the price differential is $70 – $329 for the ELEMNT; $249 for BOLT. The reason I only think that is because the Wahoo site won’t allow me to view it. It keeps redirecting me to the UK version. I’m going on what the Google search result tells me (like most of the info on this site).

What is relatively interesting (only relatively) is that there isn’t much variation from this price on Amazon and online cycling retailers. In fact, it’s quite difficult to get hold of Wahoo bike computers on Amazon at all (I can’t find the BOLT on Amazon in the US … PROPER SHOCK HORROR). Wahoo seem to sell quite a few computers directly from their website, so maybe that’s it.

In any event, I’ve ended up paying the RRP for the ELEM… the device I bought…

Wahoo ELEMNT vs ELEMNT BOLT: So Which Are We Going With?

[Drumroll] … [Realises he has no drums] … [Attempts to replicate drum roll on lycra-clad stomach] … [Mont is thrown out of the coffee shop]

I’ve decided to buy the Wahoo ELEMNT BOLT. Wahoo indeed.

Ultimately, the BOLT does everything the ELEMNT does, just in a more compact package. I don’t need the larger screen; if I need to see a map in more detail, I always carry my iPhone whilst riding.

It costs £50/$70 less.

And whatever the claims of being more aero, it looks more aero. That seals the deal. My Wiggle order tracker tells me it should arrive on Thursday.

Wait, This Is Folly, Shouldn’t I Stick With Garmin?

Maybe.

It’s a big decision to leave the ‘Garmin family’ and shack up with a Wahoo (it’s not really). I’m used to my Garmin Edge 510 and I’ve written a lot about the other GPSs in the Edge range. Maybe I should just upgrade to a newer Garmin?

Funny you should say that (or did I say it)…. I’ve actually decided to buy an Edge 520 as well (wait, what?).

In an attempt to be more useful, my plan is to compare both devices properly (i.e. by using them) and then writing up my results (er, here, on this blog). By owning them long term, hopefully I can answer any questions about both units in the future.

Plus, I’ve got to spend my mahoosive website wealth somewhere…

Products Mentioned In This Post

If you are interested in purchasing either the ELEMNT BOLT or the ELEMNT, here are those links again:

Wahoo ELEMNT

The original Wahoo bike computer. Larger than the ELEMNT Bolt, it enjoys the same great user experience. An excellent choice if you want a bigger, easy-to-read screen.

Check price
If you click this link and make a purchase, I earn a commission at no additional cost to you.

Note: these are affiliate links – if you click and buy something, I receive a commission, at no extra cost to you.

Monty - Sportive Cyclist
Monty is an enthusiastic road cyclist with only moderate talent. He started Sportive Cyclist in 2013 to record the journey to his first 100 mile ride, the RideLondon 100. Over time the blog has expanded to include training advice, gear reviews and road cycling tales, all from the perspective of a not-very-fit MAMIL. Since you're here, Monty would also like you to check out his YouTube channel. Also, Monty really needs to stop referring to himself in the third person.

31 thoughts on “Wahoo ELEMNT vs ELEMNT BOLT – What Are The Differences (And Which Is Better)?”

  1. Bought on the day that Garmin released the Edge 1030? Review from DC Rainmaker and others very positive.
    Early days but looks like they’ve taken notice of the newcomers and improved the UI, functionality etc.
    I keep my phone in a small backpack and want the battery undrained in case it’s needed in an emergency. My 810 performs flawlessly, I use it in the pitch dark as well as daylight – no issues. I’ve downloaded OpenStreetMap maps for my area (Vietnam) and they have excellent detail, even local motorbike trails are visible.
    I think for training the Wahoos are probably superior but for more general riding – touring + training and general riding in a 3rd world country then Garmin still have the edge (sorry!)

    Reply
    • Good timing eh. I’ve never really been tempted by the 1000 and the 1030 isn’t doing it for me either.

      Yes, I was (am) reasonably happy with my Edge 510. It suddenly stopped turning on unless i plugged it in to charge, which was odd and got me thinking about upgrading. I’ve since managed to fix the 510 (another post topic methinks) but the seed was sown to get something new 🙂

      Reply
  2. But … before you spend your hard-earned, what about the Hammerhead Karoo? Admittedly this isn’t actually shipping yet, but it seems to do colour, touchscreen and a whole bunch of other things for $299 for the advanced purchase price. I nearly Bolted too, but the Karoo is making me wonder if I can wait until October …

    Reply
  3. Wahoo Bolt all the way for me after years of Garmin wrangling. The Strava live segments integration walks over garmin (and it can handle live segments while following a route unlike Garmin), syncing with strava routes and ridewithgps routes is a simple joy to behold, the zoom functions are ace, the device buttons easy to access, screen clarity great, mapping (for my needs) walks over the edge 520 and allows you to self correct easily and the phone config is so good. Throw in extra power meter data fields and waaaaay better Ant+ reception with a Stages power meter than the 520 (drops signal on an out front mount all the time unlike the 510) and then there’s the price. Hasn’t lost any day in 3 months hard use and syncs like a dream…Garmin killer and about time!

    Reply
  4. Always look forward to your ramblings (oops, writings). Very informative–began reading your wisdom when I began road riding–you keep me motivated!!

    Reply
  5. I’ve been running a Bolt for since May and love it. Easy to use and has everything you need. My only problem is old(er) age leading to not being able to read some of the small print but that applies equally to all bike computers. Some screens are “zoomable” but never the one I want.

    Reply
    • Add me to the list of old(ish) folk who needs reading glasses, and screen size becomes an important criteria. So much so, I’ve been considering changing from my Garmin 500 to a 1000 just for that reason alone.

      Reply
  6. I’ve thinking and reading, and thinking and reading for a while now and entering the making my mind up at last phase. Your excellent article is leaning me towards the Bolt as well, but I wondered have you any feedback since well earned purchase Monty?

    Reply
  7. Been using an ELEMNT for over a year now. Can’t fault it. Rock solid performance, constant updates and enhancements from WAHOO, who, incidentally are very interested in user feedback and implement changes suggested on their forums.

    Screen colour is black and white and is such due to being able to be read in all lighting conditions.

    BOLT or ELEMNT, it’s a no brainer.

    Reply
  8. Hey andrew awesome comparision. (bookmarking your page right away).

    About ELEMNT vs BOLT : in black friday amazon and wahoo fitness are selling both at same price ( amazon infact selling it 20 dollars cheaper than bolt) so went for the elemnt itslef.

    In cognitive dissonance mode now. was it a good move ? or not ?

    Reply
  9. Just wondering how practical it is to use midrange smart phone for sole purpose of riding. Apparently UI, connectivity is much better on phones. Now many phones are water,dust and shock proof.
    I know some people may find batter life an issue but for most few hours ride will do.
    Would be interested to know your thoughts on that.
    Cheers.

    Reply
  10. Garmin Edge 1000 has given me grief, such as the screen freezing during auto pause after a rest break, or blue tooth synching problems with their OWN sensors. Time to try the Wahoo I think

    Reply
  11. I bought my ELEMNT a year back and had some problems with setup but got it to work. Downloading ridewithgps routes seemed difficult at times. Most club members that I ride with were buying Garmin. I bought the 1000 edge since the larger screen was important to me. Continuous problems with it; difficult to set up and didn’t always work well. The ELEMNT I had I gave to me son but he returned to me and I’m much happier riding now and have 100% confidence that I can trust the ELEMNT.

    Reply
    • Do you like the size of the regular element, Alan? I’m torn between the bolt and the original, and haven’t seen them in person. I feel like I’d LIKE the larger screen size, but many online comments about it being “bulky” leave me unsure…

      Reply
  12. Never had a bike computer before so thank you for the advice – I’m wondering what happens if you fail to follow a direction change? Is every direction change after that then misleading because it doesn’t redirect you, and you’re not where it thinks you should be? Does that make sense? I have a anotoriously s**t sense of direction, and need every bit of help I can get!

    Reply
    • Hi Glenn – I can only speak to this with certainty about the ELEMNT BOLT, but I think the ELEMNT is the same. The BOLT (like the Edge 520 and most mid range GPS computers) uses a ‘cookie crumb’ form of navigation, so it only provides navigation prompts (Turn right in 100m etc) when you are on the course. If you go off course, it beeps and the LEDs flash red. By looking at the map, you can sort of work out how to get back to the course.

      It’s not like a car though – you’ll know pretty quickly you’re off course, and you can simply stop and back track to the correct turn.

      If you get properly lost, you’d revert back to your smartphone, work out a route on that then potentially upload it to the device.

      If you want a device that has onboard ‘intelligent’ mapping, I think you’re looking at the Garmin Edge 820, 1000, 1030. To be honest though i think the combo of the Wahoo BOLT and an iphone (or similar with Google Maps) will be just as good if not better for most uses.

      Reply
  13. Sorry, another question – I wear contacts and need rrading glasses for ……..reading , putting these on and off while cycling would get a bit tedious (even at the glacial speed I can mamage) – anyone in the same situation – is a smallish screen manageable or do I need a big Garmin?

    Reply
  14. I’d say the Wahoo screen or the text on it is clearer/more defined. The zoom function works really well so you can easily press a few buttons to reduce the number of data fields (from 10 to 8 to 6 to 4 to 2 to 1) and each time you do so, the numbers/digits get bigger. If you’re unsure (and I’m unsure about the bigger Garmins), potentially worth going to have a look in a shop?

    Reply
  15. i have had elemnt and elemnt bolt got the bolt first thinking it so samish for 50 quid less , it lasted 5mins stopped working loads of lines on screen like water got it somewhere so bought elemnt which i am a year into now and i love it more than ever. I keep a record of all my rides 187 of them and 772.017km.

    Reply
  16. My Garmin Edge 500 just pooped on another ride. So plopping the doh for a new Wahoo. Their arm strap has been going strong and relatively flawlessly for about 5 years.

    But after 2 edges and both failing me often enough to cause end-of-ride dopamine kills, I’m switching allegiances on the “computer” maker. The Wahoo bolt looks better too imho. But then again – I don’t need color and am not often going to miss reading a map while riding.

    Reply
    • Thanks Mike. I’ve certainly been happy with my Wahoo Bolt and have not been tempted to go back to a Garmin at this stage.

      Reply
  17. Had the Bolt for 18 months and unfortunately when re charging the lead melted the device and caused a small fire in my kitchen. Luckily I was in the room at the time

    Reply
  18. hi,
    wanna buy a elment bolt for my trek race bike…bike24 is warning,,,,wahoo “fitness” bolt is not compatible with huawei smartphones…(?!) is this perhaps true for the elment bolt, too??
    i use a huawei smart P….

    Reply

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.